On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> or we could hack eqsel() to bound the no-stats estimate to a bit less
> than 1.
This seems like a pretty sensible thing to do. I can't immediately
imagine a situation in which 1.0 is a sensible selectivity estimate in
the no-stats case and 0.90 (say) is a major regression.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company