Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=w0Hhu_k2W-8uL-X7hrBKNGK_3fiu6zmGKrzuw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On tis, 2011-02-08 at 00:32 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>> On 11-02-06 11:40 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>
>> > PFA an updated patch with documentation.
>>
>> > Yeah, changed them.
>>
>> Those changes look fine.  The tests now pass.
>>
>> I've attached a new version of the patch that fixes a few typos/wording
>> issues I saw in the documentation.  I also changed the link to the
>> python reference manual section on context managers. I think it is
>> better to link to that versus the original PEP.
>>
>> The documentation could probably still use more word-smithing but that
>> can happen later.  I'm marking this as ready for a committer.
>
> Is it necessarily a good idea that an explicit subtransaction disables
> the implicit sub-subtransactions?  It might be conceivable that you'd
> still want to do some try/catch within explicit subtransactions.

Is this still an open question, or what is the remaining issue that
needs to be addressed with regards to this patch?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pl/python tracebacks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies