Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=uqknNTXpwP+GVZ3xbFsxsOn88=H2xHMuMOegw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)  ("Jörg Roman Rudnick" <joerg.rudnick@t-online.de>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)  (Nick Rudnick <joerg.rudnick@t-online.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> The SQL standard has the <method invocation> clause that appears to
> allow:
>
>    ...something.column.method(args)
>
> Good luck finding out how to interpret the dots, but it's specified
> somewhere.

My head just exploded.

> It'd be kind of nice as a syntax and namespacing alternative, actually,
> but figuring out the compatibility problems would be a headache.

No joke.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Named restore points
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)