On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:50, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
>>> and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
>>> generation for master, and the one for 8.4 should finish in a
>>> minute or so. I have disabled the cronjobs until someone else has
>>> verified the tarballs.
>
> Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
Just a second set of eyes that the output looks reasonable for being a
snapshot generated now.
>>> When I do, I'll also enable generation of snapshots of REL9_0_STABLE.
>>> We currently do back to 8.2 - should we keep that, or drop 8.2?
>
>> hmm I would say we should do all supported branches because those are
>> the ones that people might be interested in when looking for a fix on a
>> branch...
>
> FWIW, I think back to 8.2 is sufficient. The branches earlier than that
> are going to be unsupported in a matter of weeks anyway. And if no one
> has complained about the lack of nightly tarballs for them to date,
> it's unlikely that they'll start complaining now.
Ok. 8.2 it is then - and I'll add 9.0
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/