On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:45, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>>> - Why not initialize logid and logseg like so?:
>>>>>
>>>>> int logid = startptr.xlogid;
>>>>> int logseg = startptr.xrecoff / XLogSegSize;
>>>>>
>>>>> Then use those in your elog? Seems cleaner to me.
>>>
>>>> Hmm. Yes. Agreed.
>>>
>>> Marginal complaint here: int is the wrong type, I'm pretty sure.
>>
>> And, we should use XLByteToPrevSeg here instead of just =, I think.
>
> Not XLByteToSeg?
Checking... yeah, you are right. We should use XLByteToSeg since
the REDO starting WAL record doesn't exist in the previous WAL
segment when the REDO starting location is a boundary byte.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center