Re: crash-safe visibility map, take four

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: crash-safe visibility map, take four
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=nfHFf4VR-gSMNxaVwPzEJGwCGHZYxNW20ocoL@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: crash-safe visibility map, take four  (Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>)
Ответы Re: crash-safe visibility map, take four  (高增琦 <pgf00a@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote:
> On 2011-03-22 21:43, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I took a crack at implementing the first approach described above,
>> which seems to be by far the simplest idea we've come up with to date.
>>  Patch attached.  It doesn't seem to be that complicated, which could
>> mean either that it's not that complicated or that I'm missing
>> something.  Feel free to point and snicker in the latter case.
>
> Looks simple, but there is now benefit...

Your tests and discussion remind me that I haven't yet seen any tests
that show that index-only scans would be useful for performance.

Everyone just seems to be assuming that they make a huge difference,
and that the difference is practically realisable in a common
workload.

Perhaps that's already been done and I just didn't notice?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Radosław Smogura
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pre-set Hint bits/VACUUM FREEZE on data load..?