On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [ updated patch, in response to a review from Itagaki Takahiro ]
>
> This patch appears to be waiting for a second round of review.
> Itagaki-san, are you planning to do that?
I can, but I was waiting for other people's comments about the design: - format() in core, that implements %s, %i, and
%l.- substitute() for $n format and sprintf() that partially implements the same function in C in
contrib/stringfunc.
I don't like having three similar functions for the same purpose,
but Pavel said they are the best solutions. What will be our consensus?
--
Itagaki Takahiro