On 1 September 2010 21:46, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:39:54 -0400 2010:
>> On 1 September 2010 21:34, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:22:22 -0400 2010:
>> >
>> >> I'm coming round to the idea that if we wanted such a table of
>> >> contents, we'd generate it on the page when building the docs rather
>> >> than running some ECMAScript. I've already got a basic contents thing
>> >> showing on my version of the docs (see
>> >> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/9.0/static/functions-xml.html ),
>> >> but I'm not happy with it. It looks out of place and there doesn't
>> >> seem to be any appropriate place to put the link to show it.
>> >
>> > How does this effort relate to
>> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B7EA23A.1000705@archonet.com ?
>>
>> I think the problem with that is that it doesn't seek to build the
>> extra table of contents into the docs, but my script does appear to be
>> a duplicate effort, so even more reason for me to abandon it ;)
>
> Well, at least get *something* out there and have it committed on the
> website and/or the PG CVS .css file, before moving on and fiddling with
> a floating TOC or whatnot. And if you're going there, by all means talk
> to Richard :-)
Yes, I've committed changes to a forked git repository. :)
Anymore feedback/suggestions? Anything not look right? Are we there yet?
I was thinking the borders look a bit too bold, so might reduce them.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935