is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=G4E7rAjj3MAb89mVV+2+HWf2GFcpCGdf5Y9mH@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello

I am working on Grouping Sets support. The first issue is "cube"
keyword. Contrib module "cube" define a few functions "cube". So if we
want to continue in support this function, then "cube" have to be a
unreserved keyword. But then we have a gram conflict with mentioned
obsolete syntax. I am thinking so after removing add_missing_from this
syntax is useless. Without this feature we can clean a gramatic.

The "cube" issue can be solved without removing this feature too. We
have to check every funcname on equality to "cube" or "rollup" string.
Is this method acceptable?

Regards

Pavel Stehule


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: more personal copyrights
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch