On 4 October 2010 18:32, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>>>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously
>>>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also
>>>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>>>> as per this discussion:
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>>>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>>>>
>>>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>>>> unsorted function tables.
>>>
>>> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
>>
>> Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.
>
> I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit
> without more scrutiny than I had time to give it. Perhaps it would be
> useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the
> next CF.
Thanks Robert. I'll probably submit it for the next commitfest then :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935