On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's not quite so good for translators, I think.
>
> Another option is that we could just say "relation" (table, foreign
> table, etc...) or "type". We use the word relation as a more generic
> version of table in a few other places.
Or how about passing an ObjectType? Then we could specify
OBJECT_TABLE, OBJECT_FOREIGN_TABLE, or OBJECT_TYPE.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company