On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
>> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>> >>
>> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes,
>> >> so those have been included in this new patch.
>> >
>> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails....
>>
>> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm
>> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in
>> future?
>
> I send pure woring changes only to the docs list, and items that are
> related to behavior and docs to both. Does that help?
Well, there's basically no point in posting patches you've already
committed. We have a list where those get posted, and it's
-committers. If you're referring to patches you haven't committed
yet, then the effect of sending them to both -docs and -hackers is
presumably to encourage even fewer people to read and respond to
traffic on -docs than already do.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company