Re: pl/python tracebacks
| От | Alex Hunsaker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pl/python tracebacks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=26HegqC67MB5ue3cEwJgwNeLCdtGB8H+Sbs9c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pl/python tracebacks (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pl/python tracebacks
Re: pl/python tracebacks |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:50, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
> On 12/02/11 04:12, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> In PLy_traceback fname and prname look like they will leak (well as
>> much as a palloc() in an error path can leak I suppose).
>
> But they're no palloc'd, no? fname is either a static "<module"> string,
> or PyString_AsString, which also doesn't allocate memory, AFAIK.
Yeah, I was flat out wrong about proname :-(.
As for fname, I must be missing some magic. We have:
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION > 3
...
#define PyString_AsString(x) PLyUnicode_AsString(x)
....
PLyUnicode_AsString(PyObject *unicode)
{ PyObject *o = PLyUnicode_Bytes(unicode); char *rv = pstrdup(PyBytes_AsString(o));
Py_XDECREF(o); return rv;
}
PyString_AsString is used all over the place without any pfrees. But I
have no Idea how that pstrdup() is getting freed if at all.
Care to enlighten me ?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: