On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > OTOH, we don't have a similar interlock to prevent renaming users
>> > who have active sessions, so maybe we are being overprotective here.
>>
>> Yep. What is worse is that we can drop users who have active sessions
>> on the standby. Then we can get the following error from those sessions:
>>
>> => SELECT current_user;
>> ERROR: invalid role OID: 16384
>
> Hot Standby faithfully implements the current behaviour on the master in
> that case.
Oh, right. Sorry for noise.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center