Re: update - which way quicker?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От paul socha
Тема Re: update - which way quicker?
Дата
Msg-id A826B099-A9BA-4CDF-A7BA-AAB0BC739E67@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на update - which way quicker?  (Emi Lu <emilu@encs.concordia.ca>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 2008-08-28, at 21:31, Emi Lu wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> Tried to compare Table1 based on Table2
>
> . update table1.col = false
>   if table1.pk_cols not in table2.pk_cols
>
>
>
> For the following two ways, (2) always performs better than (1) right,
> and I need your inputs.
> ======================================================================
> ==
> (1) update table1
>     set col = false
>     where table1.pk_co1 || table1.pk_col2.... || table1.pk_colN
>
>     NOT IN
>
>     (select pk_co1 || pk_col2.... || pk_colN
>      from table2
>      )
>
> (2) ResultSet(rs) =
>     select pk_col1||pk_col2... || pk_colN
>     from table1
>     left join table2 using (pk_col1..., pk_colN)
>     where table2.pk_col1 is null
>
>     Then for each rs record, do:
>     update table1
>     set col = false
>     where col1||... colN in rs.value
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-
> performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



Check EXISTS

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-subquery.html


Serdecznie pozdrawiam

Pawel Socha
pawel.socha@gmail.com

programista/administrator

perl -le 's**02).4^&-%2,).^9%4^!./4(%2^3,!#+7!2%^53%2&**y%& -;^[%"`-
{ a%%s%%$_%ee'


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: select on 22 GB table causes "An I/O error occured while sending to the backend." exception
Следующее
От: cluster
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Best hardware/cost tradoff?