Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Albe Laurenz
Тема Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Дата
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B50FA8609@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?  (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>)
Ответы Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Список pgsql-general
pinker wrote:
> I've tried to write audit trigger which fires only when data changed, so I used "WHEN (OLD.* IS
> DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause as described in documentation
> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-createtrigger.html> . Should this clause be independent
> from data type? because an error occurs when I'm trying to modify row with point data type: ERROR:
> could not identify an equality operator for type point

I guess it is dependent on data type as it requires an equality operator,
and type "point" doesn't have one.

You'd have to hand-roll a comparison in this case, probably using the
"same as" operator "~=".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: pinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?