Re: Recovery_target_time misinterpreted?

Klaus Ita wrote:
> I have restored a Database Cluster with a recovery_target_time set to
> 
> recovery_target_time =  '2013-07-27 21:20:17.127664+00'
> recovery_target_inclusive = false
> 
> 
> 
> now it seems the restore rather restored to some point in time (rather the 18th than the 27th). Is
> there an explanation for this huge gap? Is that the last 'consistent state'?

Maybe the log entries created during restore can answer the question.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe