Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
| От | Daniel Gustafsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | A6A434CC-AA6D-4DD2-A26E-B6E226CCAD9B@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Julien Rouhaud also pointed out off-list that the help output and documentation
aren't in agreement about how --quiet works. In the documentation we say:
"Print fewer messages, and less detail regarding any server errors."
But the help output takes a stronger position on this:
$ ./bin/pg_amcheck --help |grep quiet
-q, --quiet don't write any messages
The latter isn't entirely true IMO, so I think we should reconcile them with
something like this while in here and fixing things anyways:
- printf(_(" -q, --quiet don't write any messages\n"));
+ printf(_(" -q, --quiet print fewer and less detailed messages\n"));
Thoughts?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: