Re: BUG #17910: gcc-introduced load may cause concurrency bug
| От | Daniel Gustafsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17910: gcc-introduced load may cause concurrency bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | A34A108F-E4AA-42DD-9EAC-9754D003AF3E@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #17910: gcc-introduced load may cause concurrency bug (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On 27 Apr 2023, at 10:45, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
> we discover that, under Ubuntu 20.04 with gcc-12.1, built
> postgres-release-15.2 has an
> compiled-introduced load operation in "_bt_parallel_build_main(dsm_segment
> *seg, shm_toc *toc)",
Thanks for your report!
> we can see the compiled program load `btshared->isconcurrent` twice, and
> each loaded value is used
> for an assignment. And `btshared->isconcurrent` seems to be a shared object,
> if it's modified
> concurrently else where between the `cmp` and `mov` instructions, there may
> be some concurrency
> bugs.
The isconcurrent struct member is set to indicate if the operation is a CREATE
INDEX CONCURRENTLY or not, and should not be changed at any point during the
index creation. If you look at the definition of BTShared it has this comment:
/*
* These fields are not modified during the sort. They primarily exist
* for the benefit of worker processes that need to create BTSpool state
* corresponding to that used by the leader.
*/
Oid heaprelid;
Oid indexrelid;
bool isunique;
bool nulls_not_distinct;
bool isconcurrent;
int scantuplesortstates;
There should be no concurrent modifications of this, did you observe any such
case where this caused an issue?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: