[GENERAL] Chained slaves smaller?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jon Erdman
Тема [GENERAL] Chained slaves smaller?
Дата
Msg-id A057D712-C5AA-41F1-BAA4-79115B4986AA@thewickedtribe.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Chained slaves smaller?
Re: [GENERAL] Chained slaves smaller?
Список pgsql-general
Hi,

I have SR set up in a couple of datacenters, where there’s a master in DC_A with 2 slaves, and a 3rd slave off that
masterin DC_ B. Also, in DC_B I have 2 slaves chained off the “local master”. Our main database is ~551GB in DC_A and
onthe replica in B that is subscribed to the real master. However, on one of the chained slaves in DC_B that database
isonly 484GB. The only thing different about this smaller slave is that it was created by taking a basebackup from the
“localmaster” in DC_B rather than sucking it over the WAN from the true master in DC_A.  

This makes no sense to me since I thought SR replicas are bit for bit copies, so I’m somewhat concerned. Any ideas how
thiscould be? 
—
Jon Erdman
Postgres Zealot

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Igal @ Lucee.org"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Download 9.6.3 Binaries
Следующее
От: Jerry Sievers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Chained slaves smaller?