> > > Here's a patch implementing the "thread method" to
> > workaround the bug
> > > with socket calls in signal handlers. See details in mail to
> > > pgsql-hackers-win32 a couple of minutes ago.
> >
> > Looks ok, but wouldn't it be better placed in pgstat.c?
>
> Actually, I don't think so. I considered it, and chose to put it in
> postmaster.c for the following reason:
>
> The functon pgstat_beterm itself is *not* the problem. In theory, it can
> be called from places that are not signal handlers (sure, it's not done
> today I think, but internal-API-wise, it could). That goes against
> putting the fix ther.
Sure, like I said, my 2c. Just looks a little out of place. Understand point
on API, but think it is clear that this isn't a win32 replacement for
pgstat_beterm, but a win32 replacement for pgstat_beterm *called from a
signal handler* (perhaps a function name change would make it this clearer).
In any case, not fussed.
What I am wondering about now, is where else we need to change? AFAICS,
there is (at least?) one signal handler that performs sockets ops, namely
Async_NotifyHandler.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>