Re: "user"

"Daniel �kerud" <zilch@home.se> wrote in message
news:007101c13b96$834e8960$c901a8c0@automatic100...
>
> Anyway I called it "uzer" now. Maybe usr is better... users is out of the
> question since table names are supposed to go in singularis.

Since a table is a collection of things, plural always seemed to make
more sense to me. But I've seen it done both ways. Postgres system
tables are singular, but it SqlServer, they're plural.

What do other people think?


Marshall