Re: Combine query views into one SQL string
| От | Gledatelj |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Combine query views into one SQL string |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9nkbg3$9db$1@bagan.srce.hr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Combine query views into one SQL string ("Maik" <K.Maik@web.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Hy Maik, you can select it directly from the tables using following sql statement (but it's same as using views): select t1.id, t1.f1, t2.f2 from (select id, sum(amount) f1 from table1 group by id) t1, (select id, sum(amount) f2 from table2 group by id) t2 where t1.id = t2.id but, you must also know that in this way you may not get all the records (sum of amount of all id-s) if this is your intention, but just sum of amount of identical id-s (contained in both tables). Maybe this will help you. "Eimas" <eimas@lycos.com> wrote in message news:63e57aa8.0109091520.4f975abd@posting.google.com... > "Maik" <K.Maik@web.de> wrote in message news:<9na15r$ku4$1@narses.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>... > > Its clear, union concat the two results. > > > > But he can also use this join version, if its the intention. > > > > select t1.id, sum(t1.amount), t2.id, sum(t2.amount) from table1 as t1, > > table2 as t2 where t1.id=t2.id; > > > > Ciao Maik > > This is not right, i wouldnt even bather you if this was the simple > answer. > > t1.id=t2.id would mean in doubled or tripled aggregation, > since t1.id and t2.id are not unique, thats why I had to aggregate > them in first Q1, Q2 querires, and link them by ID in the last one. > > I don't understand what UNION got to do here. then you probably have > to make three union links of inner, left and right joined tables. > > This is not that easy as it seems. > Is there a universal SQL string "expanding" rules, like in math or so? > > Thanks
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: