Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9ff0a03a-db64-dbab-3896-10c19ff009ce@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)
(Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/20/23 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > On 9/20/23 01:24, Tom Lane wrote: >> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> bsd@freebsd:~ $ tclsh8.6 >>> % clock scan "1/26/2010" >>> time value too large/small to represent >> >> In hopes of replicating this, I tried installing FreeBSD 14-BETA2 >> aarch64 on my Pi 3B. This test case works fine: >> >> $ tclsh8.6 >> % clock scan "1/26/2010" >> 1264482000 >> >> $ tclsh8.7 >> % clock scan "1/26/2010" >> 1264482000 >> >> and unsurprisingly, pltcl's regression tests pass. I surmise >> that something is broken in BETA1 that they fixed in BETA2. >> >> plpython works too, with the python 3.9 package (and no older >> python). >> >> However, all is not peachy, because plperl doesn't work. >> Trying to CREATE EXTENSION either plperl or plperlu leads >> to a libperl panic: >> >> pl_regression=# create extension plperl; >> server closed the connection unexpectedly >> This probably means the server terminated abnormally >> before or while processing the request. >> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded. >> >> with this in the postmaster log: >> >> panic: pthread_key_create failed >> >> That message is certainly not ours, so it must be coming out of libperl. >> >> Another thing that seemed strange is that ecpg's preproc.o takes >> O(forever) to compile. I killed the build after observing that the >> compiler had gotten to 40 minutes of CPU time, and redid that step >> with PROFILE=-O0, which allowed it to compile in 20 seconds or so. >> (I also tried -O1, but gave up after a few minutes.) This machine >> can compile the main backend grammar in a minute or two, so there is >> something very odd there. >> >> I'm coming to the conclusion that 14-BETA is, well, beta grade. >> I'll be interested to see if you get the same results when you >> update to BETA2. > > Thanks, I'll try that when I'll be at the office next week. > FWIW when I disabled tcl, the tests pass (it's running with --nostatus --nosend, so it's not visible on the buildfarm site). Including the plperl stuff: ============== running regression test queries ============== test plperl ... ok 397 ms test plperl_lc ... ok 152 ms test plperl_trigger ... ok 374 ms test plperl_shared ... ok 163 ms test plperl_elog ... ok 184 ms test plperl_util ... ok 210 ms test plperl_init ... ok 150 ms test plperlu ... ok 117 ms test plperl_array ... ok 228 ms test plperl_call ... ok 189 ms test plperl_transaction ... ok 412 ms test plperl_plperlu ... ok 238 ms ====================== All 12 tests passed. ====================== I wonder if this got broken between BETA1 and BETA2. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Tomas VondraДата:
Сообщение: Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)