Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)
Дата
Msg-id 9ff0a03a-db64-dbab-3896-10c19ff009ce@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9/20/23 19:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/20/23 01:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> bsd@freebsd:~ $ tclsh8.6
>>> % clock scan "1/26/2010"
>>> time value too large/small to represent
>>
>> In hopes of replicating this, I tried installing FreeBSD 14-BETA2
>> aarch64 on my Pi 3B.  This test case works fine:
>>
>> $ tclsh8.6
>> % clock scan "1/26/2010"
>> 1264482000
>>
>> $ tclsh8.7
>> % clock scan "1/26/2010"
>> 1264482000
>>
>> and unsurprisingly, pltcl's regression tests pass.  I surmise
>> that something is broken in BETA1 that they fixed in BETA2.
>>
>> plpython works too, with the python 3.9 package (and no older
>> python).
>>
>> However, all is not peachy, because plperl doesn't work.
>> Trying to CREATE EXTENSION either plperl or plperlu leads
>> to a libperl panic:
>>
>> pl_regression=# create extension plperl;
>> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>>         This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>>         before or while processing the request.
>> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded.
>>
>> with this in the postmaster log:
>>
>> panic: pthread_key_create failed
>>
>> That message is certainly not ours, so it must be coming out of libperl.
>>
>> Another thing that seemed strange is that ecpg's preproc.o takes
>> O(forever) to compile.  I killed the build after observing that the
>> compiler had gotten to 40 minutes of CPU time, and redid that step
>> with PROFILE=-O0, which allowed it to compile in 20 seconds or so.
>> (I also tried -O1, but gave up after a few minutes.)  This machine
>> can compile the main backend grammar in a minute or two, so there is
>> something very odd there.
>>
>> I'm coming to the conclusion that 14-BETA is, well, beta grade.
>> I'll be interested to see if you get the same results when you
>> update to BETA2.
> 
> Thanks, I'll try that when I'll be at the office next week.
> 

FWIW when I disabled tcl, the tests pass (it's running with --nostatus
--nosend, so it's not visible on the buildfarm site). Including the
plperl stuff:

============== running regression test queries        ==============
test plperl                       ... ok          397 ms
test plperl_lc                    ... ok          152 ms
test plperl_trigger               ... ok          374 ms
test plperl_shared                ... ok          163 ms
test plperl_elog                  ... ok          184 ms
test plperl_util                  ... ok          210 ms
test plperl_init                  ... ok          150 ms
test plperlu                      ... ok          117 ms
test plperl_array                 ... ok          228 ms
test plperl_call                  ... ok          189 ms
test plperl_transaction           ... ok          412 ms
test plperl_plperlu               ... ok          238 ms

======================
 All 12 tests passed.
======================

I wonder if this got broken between BETA1 and BETA2.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dikkop seems unhappy because of openssl stuff (FreeBSD 14-BETA1)
Следующее
От: "Tristan Partin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime