Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index
Дата
Msg-id 9ed540ed-3319-ed73-1bc8-2153c29eb036@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index  (Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/24/2017 10:52 AM, Adam Brusselback wrote:
> My understanding is that global indexes allow foreign keys to work 
> naturally with partitioned tables, or tables in an inheritance 
> hierarchy.  That is pretty big IMO, as it allows you to partition a 
> table without making a trade-off in your database integrity.

It is, in fact the reason that even with 10 we don't really have 
partitioning as much as syntactical sugar for partitioning. (Not trying 
to take away from that, having the syntactical sugar is a huge first step).

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length