On 4/21/17 09:59, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Rereading the code again, it's actually not bug as we update the rstate
> to what syncworker says, but it's obviously confusing so probably still
> worth to commit that.
We don't have the syncworker->relmutex at that point, so it's probably
better to read the previously-copied value in rstate->state.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services