Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication launcher's bgworker enabled bydefault, and max_logical_replication_workers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Petr Jelinek
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication launcher's bgworker enabled bydefault, and max_logical_replication_workers
Дата
Msg-id 9d4d3b3e-7460-3ba3-03ef-6f7ec2dd4197@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Logical replication launcher's bgworker enabled by default, and max_logical_replication_workers  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 23/01/17 05:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> When spawning a new instance, I found the following thing, which is
> surprising at first sight:
> postgres: bgworker: logical replication launcher
> 
> There is perhaps no problem to keep that enabled by default until the
> release 10 wraps to give it some buildfarm coverage similarly to what
> has been done last year for parallel query, but what is surprising me
> is that even if wal_level is *not* logical this gets started. I think
> that something like the patch attached is needed, so as
> ApplyLauncherRegister() is a noop if wal_level < logical.
> 

As discussed elsewhere, there is no need for wal_level = logical
downstream and launcher is only needed for downstream.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Undefined psql variables