On 2017/01/14 13:36, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related
>>> feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently added routine
>>> rather than doing the same thing in a different way.
>>
>> Oh, I see. Amit, thoughts?
>
> Hm, perhaps. The code in map_partition_varattnos() that creates the
> map could be replaced by a call to the new
> convert_tuples_by_name_map(). In fact, it could even have used the
> old version of it (convert_tuples_by_name()). I guess I just aped
> what other callers of map_variable_attnos() were doing, which is to
> generate the map themselves (not that they ought to be changed to use
> convert_tuples_by_name_map).
>
> I will send a patch at my earliest convenience. Thanks to Alvaro for
> pointing that out.
And here is the patch.
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers