Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id 9ba4d9eb-1481-489c-a1ec-ce1893e8ec15@eisentraut.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  (Andrei Zubkov <zubkov@moonset.ru>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 24.10.23 09:58, Andrei Zubkov wrote:
> During last moving to the current commitfest this patch have lost its
> reviewers list. With respect to reviewers contribution in this patch, I
> think reviewers list should be fixed.

I don't think it's the purpose of the commitfest app to track how *has* 
reviewed a patch.  The purpose is to plan and allocate *current* work. 
If we keep a bunch of reviewers listed on a patch who are not actually 
reviewing the patch, then that effectively blocks new reviewers from 
signing up and the patch will not make progress.

Past reviewers should of course be listed in the commit message, the 
release notes, etc. as appropriate.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: Open a streamed block for transactional messages during decoding
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: trying again to get incremental backup