On 3/19/20 3:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> What is that status of this patch set? I think we have nailed down the
> behavior, but there were some concerns about certain performance
> characteristics. Do people feel that those are required to be addressed
> in this cycle?
Personally I would rather see it merged if the code is correct (which it
seems like it is from what I can tell) as the performance seems to be
good enough for it to be useful.
Unicode normalization is a feature which I have wished and at least for
my use cases the current implementation is more than fast enough.
Andreas