Remove usage of finalizers ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heiko W. Rupp
Тема Remove usage of finalizers ?
Дата
Msg-id 9E5438C0-0A2E-4543-BE06-1E7A6D0E3B83@pilhuhn.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Remove usage of finalizers ?
Re: Remove usage of finalizers ?
Список pgsql-jdbc
Hey,

the other day we ran into a situation where our app ran into a OOME situation on heavy
load. It turned out that we had around 290k objects on the Finalizer queue, that
were Statements.

There has been a discussion in the past about finalizers (
see e.g. around  http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BCD42993-CB7B-453F-95B4-09E84A956AB0@me.com ).

I understand that Connection objects are supposed implement a finalizer (is that actually true?),
but here the penalty is not that high, as Connections usually are pooled and are thus long living.

Other JDBC objects like Statements are extremely short lived and the creation rate can be
on a busy application much higher than the finalization rate (which is what we were seeing).

So I wonder if the driver could be rewritten in a way that either
- uses no finalizers for the short lived objects
or
- exist in 2 flavors: a debug version that does excessive logging in the
 finalizer if the objects were not yet closed (and stays as is wrt the extra work)
 and a production version where
 the finalize() methods are removed, so that the objects do not end up
 in the finalizer queue and can't pile up under high load.

Developers could then use the devel version and the other driver for production.

Relying on the finalize() method to close/free objects on the PG server is a bad
idea anyway, as there is no guarantee when finalizers run or if they run at all.

  Thanks
       Heiko


--
Heiko Rupp   hwr@pilhuhn.de
Blog: http://pilhuhn.blogspot.com   @pilhuhn



В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stéphan BEUZE
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [***] Re: Set application name from jdbc url
Следующее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove usage of finalizers ?