Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
| От | Andrey M. Borodin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9D8A5BC8-A3A5-4DA9-9382-F30D343247D1@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 7 Jan 2025, at 16:05, Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com> wrote: > >> 1. This code seems a little different from your patch. It is trying to avoid engaging PRNG. I'm not sure it's a good idea,but still. Also, it uses "<=", not "<". >> >> xact_is_sampled = log_xact_sample_rate != 0 && >> (log_xact_sample_rate == 1 || >> pg_prng_double(&pg_global_prng_state) <= log_xact_sample_rate); >> > Are we sure we're discussing the same patch? Because these remarks refer to the 5 version of the patch, which I abandoneddue to your remarks. Yes. v6 has this code + if (nesting_level == 0) + current_query_sampled = (pg_prng_double(&pg_global_prng_state) < pgss_sample_rate); while upstream has code that I cited. And logic is slightly different. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: