> On Mar 19, 2025, at 15:06, Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:
>
> From an (admittedly somewhat naïve) look at the code, it appears that having it honor the cost delay wouldn't
introduceexcessive blocking, as long as the delay wasn't implemented at a really dumb place.
Specifically, it looks like doing the cost-based wait immediately after backend/storage/freespace/freespace.c:898 (in
HEAD)wouldn't be in a critical section, although I could be totally in the weeds on this.