Re: Why JDBC 1?

Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
run.

Dave
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:50, Rene Pijlman wrote:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
> JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?
>
> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>