Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Дата
Msg-id 9980.1134852474@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you
> want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long.

No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have
only a README.  I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc
versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some
doc files just loose in their top directory).

It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
Makefiles don't install them either.

It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
forestall name conflicts?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation