Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9974.1288887285@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump
Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Trying to understand real world cases that this would
>> break...would the following now fail w/o explicit cast?
>>
>> create type x as (a int, b int);
>> select f((1,2));
> It already does:
I think Merlin probably meant to write "select x((1,2))", but that
doesn't work out-of-the-box either. What would be affected is
something like
select text((1,2));
which you'd now be forced to write as
select (1,2)::text;
(or you could use CAST notation; but not text(row) or row.text).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: