Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> We should benchmark the planner on increasingly large sets of
> relations on a typical developer machine and set geqo to whatever
> value the planner can handle in that length of time. I suspect even at
> 10s you're talking about substantially larger values than the current
> default.

The problem is to find some realistic "benchmark" cases.  That's one
reason why I was pestering Andreas to see his actual use cases ...
        regards, tom lane