Re: postgresql13-devel vs libpq-devel
От | Devrim Gündüz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql13-devel vs libpq-devel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9966f2577a74a4f8490867821e27b7cb8d33a857.camel@gunduz.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgresql13-devel vs libpq-devel (Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info>) |
Список | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi Marcin, On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:24 +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > The RHEL 9 machine I have has postgresql13, -libs, -server and -devel > installed from the PGDG repository (all at the 13.20-1PGDG revision). > > Today I have tried to rebuild a package provided by Red Hat (rsyslog) > and it has a build time dependency on libpq-devel [1]. > > dnf --enablerepo pgdg-common --enablerepo pgdg13 install libpq-devel > > does nothing since "postgresql13-devel" already "obsoletes" libpq-deve > but it does not full replace it (it does not "provide" libpq-devel). That's because I never thought of replacing libpq-devel (not that I did not want to, I missed that) > > This is kind of expected, I could install postgresql13-devel, > postgresdql14-devel > up to the 18 if I really like in parallel. I can't do this with libpq- > devel. > > However, the RPM packages obviously want to have it Red Hat way, no > the Postgres way. > > Today, as it happens, RHEL 9 has 13.20 in their base, and I have > 13.20-1PGDG > installed, but this is just a nice coincidene - I have simply done > > dnf erase --noautoremove postgresql13-devel > dbf install libpq-devel > > Is there any elegant solution to this problem? For example, is there > any clean way to say "please using my postgresql13-devel and instead > of libpq-devel?" > to rpmbuild? That would require telling PATH and pkgconf to go > somewhere else... There are two options in here: 1. Edit the spec file and replace libpq-devel BR with libpq5-devel. 2. (As you suggested): Export PATH like this (and line 45): https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgrpms.git;a=blob;f=rpm/redhat/main/non-common/plxslt/main/plxslt.spec#l40 In your case replace %{pginstdir} with /usr/pgsql-13 I'd do the latter (see below) > Or maybe postgresql13-devel and libpq-devel should get along with each > other? > I think postgresql13-libs and RHEL's libpq do, and both provide > "libpq.so.5()". So, history first: After introducing multiple version installation about 15 years ago (I know, I know...) my plan was to wait until 8.4 is EOLed so that I could build a common libpq/libpq-devel package in our repo. It never happened as I did not want to break any builds. But that is now past. In the last couple weeks I made a few attempts to build a libpq5-devel which provides all pieces of a postgresql$latestMajorVersion-devel . It is still WIP. Once that is done I can *also* obsolete libpq-devel. -HTH Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Вложения
В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления: