Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More time spending with "delete pending" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 995713.1605725597@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: More time spending with "delete pending" (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> writes:
> 15.11.2020 04:11, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> Your patch introduces a "loops", but doesn't use it to escape the loop.
> Indeed, this is my mistake. Please look at the corrected patch (now that
> code corresponds to the pgwin32_open() as intended).
So what you're saying (and what the buildfarm seems to confirm, since
we are still seeing "Permission denied" failures from time to time,
eg [1]) is that all that code that bed90759f added to deal with
delete-pending is just junk, because we never get that far if the
file is delete-pending. So shouldn't we remove all of it? (That's
lines 214-276 in win32stat.c, plus some earlier declarations that
would now be unneeded.)
I'd be kind of inclined to change pgwin32_open() to use
microsoft_native_stat, as well, because these two functions
really ought to be handling this exactly alike.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2020-11-18%2018%3A02%3A04
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: