Re: win32 performance - fsync question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Дата
Msg-id 9957.1108668050@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: win32 performance - fsync question  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Ответы Re: win32 performance - fsync question  (Evgeny Rodichev <er@sai.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> WinXP  fsync = true     20-28 tps
>> WinXP  fsync = false      600 tps
>> Linux  fsync = true       800 tps
>> Linux  fsync = false      980 tps

> Wow, that's terrible on Windows.  If there's a solution, it'd be nice to 
> backport it...

Actually, the number that's way out of line there is the Linux w/fsync
one.  I infer that he's got disk write cache enabled and therefore the
transactions aren't really being synced to disk at all.

Any claimed TPS rate exceeding your disk drive's rotation rate is a
red flag.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Следующее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: win32 performance - fsync question