Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aaron J. Seigo
Тема Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging
Дата
Msg-id 99102515535807.00882@stilborne
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging
Список pgsql-hackers
hi...

> What about
> SET LOGLEVEL TO <something>;
> SET LOGDETAIL TO <something>;
> or the like. You could use pg_shadow.usesuper as a security stipulation.
> Using something like a signal to do this is probably overkill, especially
> since there are hardly any left, and it's also infinitely less intuitive
> and flexible.

this would be done from psql? if so, here's a query i have: are there any plans
to seperate the admin functions out of psql and into another seperate tool? 

i have a queasyness with general users having access to a tool that can
do admin takss (even if they supposedly don't have a superuser account).

it also seems much cleaner to have admin in one tool and data interaction in
another.

am i off track here?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
Sys Admin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging
Следующее
От: Byron Nikolaidis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch