Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> we have a good number of '(GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(n)' in our
> code - looks a bit better & shorter to have PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY(n).
Should be PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY_P to match existing conventions,
otherwise +1
regards, tom lane