Re: remove pg_restrict workaround
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: remove pg_restrict workaround |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 98cc3f46-b2ae-4120-b902-f41158ffd44e@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: remove pg_restrict workaround (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: remove pg_restrict workaround
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.01.26 00:23, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 at 08:04, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> Committed with a backward compatibility define.
>
> I'm working on adding a C++ extension module to my copyObject
> patchset[1]. But turns out that this change has completely broken
> compiling C++ extensions on MSVC. This is happening due to
> __declspec(restrict) being replaced by __declspec(__restrict), which
> the original comments also mentioned as the reason for having our own
> flavor. This replacement then makes the core of a corecrt_malloc.h
> MSVC header invalid[2].
meson.build already contains a hint about the solution:
# Even though restrict is in C99 and should be supported by all
# supported compilers, this indirection is useful because __restrict
# also works in C++ in all supported compilers. (If not, then we
# might have to write a real test.) (restrict is not part of the C++
# standard.)
cdata.set('restrict', '__restrict')
Or maybe instead of writing a test, we should add something like this to
c.h:
#ifdef __cplusplus
#ifdef __GNUC__
#define restrict __restrict
#else
#define restrict
#endif
#endif
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: