Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Geier
Тема Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
Дата
Msg-id 989acbcf-e950-7911-c2e2-fe7aa7d15108@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?  (David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2/7/23 19:12, Andres Freund wrote:
> This fails to build on several platforms:
>
> https://cirrus-ci.com/github/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/commitfest%2F42%2F3751

I think I fixed the compilation errors. It was due to a few variables 
being declared under

#if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__linux__)

while being used also under non x86 Linux.

I also removed again the code to obtain the TSC frequency under 
hypervisors because the TSC is usually emulated and therefore no faster 
than clock_gettime() anyways. So we now simply fallback to 
clock_gettime() on hypervisors when we cannot obtain the frequency via 
leaf 0x16.

Beyond that I reviewed the first two patches a while ago in [1]. I hope 
we can progress with them to further reduce the size of this patch set.

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3ac157f7-085d-e071-45fc-b87cd306360c%40gmail.com 


-- 
David Geier
(ServiceNow)

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum