Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]

David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we be doing something
>> about such cases, or is playing dumb correct?

> The SQL standard handles deciding the behavior based on whether WITH
> CHECK OPTION is included in the view DDL.  See the section 2 of the
> SQL standard (Foundation) for details.

Ah, I see it.  So as long as we don't support WITH CHECK OPTION, we
can ignore the issue.
        regards, tom lane