On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 21:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> However, now that I know the real issue is you're using inet_addr, I
>>> would like to know why you're not using inet_aton instead; or even
>>> better, something that also copes with IPv6.
>
>> "Path of least resistance?"
>
>> Which method would you suggest?
>
> I haven't actually read the RADIUS patch, but generally we rely on
> pg_getaddrinfo_all to interpret strings representing IP addresses.
> Is there a reason not to use that?
I don't think so. I'll look it over.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/