On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 07:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> ... I don't see much sense in worrying about it now; the 2 weeks between end
>> of CF and Beta are when we need to be cut-throat. Given that this time the
>> "must-have" feature is already in the tree, I think you will find people coming
>> around quickly to the side of pushing things out rather than fighting to get
>> things in.
>
> I think the other Robert's main point is that getting to beta in only
> two weeks is ridiculously optimistic (which I'm afraid I agree with).
> I believe that what he's proposing is tossing enough stuff overboard
> so that we can finish the January CF in much less than a month, and
> thereby have more time for alpha-level testing and stabilization of
> the tree.
I realize it's moving the goalposts and not necessraily fair, but we
could always try to cut a week off the CF for some more stabilization
period if we think that'll be enough to make a difference.
> Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something*
> on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally
> considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps
> much though; it just means we need more time in beta.
That sounds mor elike a final alpha release, in that case?
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/