Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Дата
Msg-id 9837222c0911160030x18e8c6b6i4156f01ad05d3aa8@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> On Saturday, November 14, 2009, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> Not 8.2?
>
>> Done.
>
> Buildfarm member narwhal seems to think it's not quite right in 8.2.

Drat.

So, the new API function requires Windows 2000 or more, and I think
the reason it's failing is that the headers in 8.2 don't specify that
at this point. Which means that 8.2 today theoretically at least runs
on NT4. Which leads to the question - do we want to back out the
patch, have 8.2 keep working on that, and having 8.2 fail in the few
unusual scenarios we have now, or do we also backpatch the requirement
to run on win2k or later?


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Multixact and prepared transactions