On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:06, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Monday 03 August 2009 23:08:51 Josh Berkus wrote:
> The web team has to figure out whether putting the docs on the web site is
> worthwhile. We already have the developer docs that are rebuild on every
> check-in.
As long as the HTML files are available, we can make this happen. We
don't have the website servers set up with the full build tools, and
we don't want that :-) It is probably not going to be a terrible
amount of work, so if we are going to actually push for people to do
serious testing on the alpha releases, we should definitely get the
docs up on the website.
I don't think we should keep an archive of "old alphas" though -
that's going to leave us with insane amounts of documentation sets.
But we could have a /docs/alpha/ which would hold the latest released
alpha.
-- Magnus HaganderSelf: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/