Re: [HACKERS] Bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom I Helbekkmo
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
Дата
Msg-id 980206175035.28441B@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Bug?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian said:

> The only fix for this would be to read all integers in as 64-bit
> integers, then do the conversion, but that could be a performance
> problem.

Michael Meskes answered:

> I agree. And performance is important. I think explicit type
> conversion is what we should do. Or is it asked for too much if the
> user has to add a ::float8 to the number?

Am I being dense here?  Can there really be a significant performance
hit in the parsing of a query?  Let's say that it takes a millisecond
extra to do the right thing with a number.  Does it matter?  How many
queries per second can we expect to process anyway?

-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas DBT
Дата:
Сообщение: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: atttypmod of 0
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend